BEIJING — President Trump’s decision on Thursday to cancel his planned summit meeting with Kim Jong-un, North Korea’s leader, will disappoint some allies in Asia, hearten others — and perhaps put China in the strongest position of all.
Mr. Trump’s announcement put the brakes on disarmament negotiations that had been hurtling ahead at an unprecedented pace. Instead of a meeting with Mr. Kim, Mr. Trump vowed that “our very strong sanctions, by far the strongest in history, and maximum pressure campaign will continue.”
But applying that pressure depends in large part on cooperation from China, which may now be able to use any delays in negotiations with North Korea to its advantage in trade talks with the United States.
Much will depend, of course, on how North Korea reacts to Mr. Trump’s decision to pull out of the talks. After a year of breakthrough missile launches and a sixth nuclear test, Mr. Kim abruptly put his nation on a path toward peace — suspending weapons tests, releasing American prisoners and, just hours before Mr. Trump’s announcement, destroying its nuclear test site.
It is unclear how Mr. Trump’s withdrawal from the meeting with Mr. Kim will affect the internal politics of North Korea’s secretive regime. If Mr. Kim feels compelled to resume weapons tests and his drive to demonstrate that he can strike the United States with a nuclear warhead, the region will be on edge once again.
But if he refrains, Mr. Kim may have already earned enough good will among his neighbors — especially China, his country’s main trading partner — to see some softening of the economic sanctions against his isolated nation, without agreeing to give up his nuclear arsenal.
“Trump walking away from the summit lets North Korea meet all its objectives: public recognition, lighter sanctions, damage to U.S. alliances and continued nuclear advancement,” said Adam Mount, a senior fellow at the Federation of American Scientists in Washington.
South Korea’s president, Moon Jae-in, helped broker the planned meeting between Mr. Kim and Mr. Trump. Now he is likely to be damaged politically if the talks are entirely derailed.
“Moon Jae-in’s people must be panic-stricken by now because they have invested so much in the Trump-Kim summit,” said Lee Byong-chul, a senior fellow at the Institute for Peace and Cooperation in Seoul. “At home, they will face a gleeful political opposition who will ridicule them for being so naïve.”
Prime Minister Shinzo Abe of Japan, on the other hand, may be breathing a sigh of relief. Officials in Tokyo were worried that the talks were moving too quickly, without enough Japanese involvement, and could result in a deal that would benefit the United States but leave Japan vulnerable to North Korea’s arsenal.
President Xi Jinping of China has also appeared nervous about the pace of the talks and the prospect of Mr. Kim’s getting too close to the Americans, particularly given his independent streak and past willingness to buck China.
But the cancellation of the meeting allows Mr. Xi to use his influence with North Korea — including his ability to tighten or weaken enforcement of economic sanctions against it — as leverage while Beijing negotiates a trade deal with Washington.
“It is in Xi’s interest not only to delay but to have the summit pending for as long as possible,” said James Mann, the author of “The China Fantasy.”
“The prospect of a deal without a deal itself gives China leverage over the U.S., especially on trade,” he added.
Cheng Xiaohe, a North Korea expert at Renmin University in Beijing, described Mr. Trump’s decision as “bad news,” but said it might allow Mr. Xi to act as a mediator. “The cancellation may offer China an opportunity to do something to salvage the aborted meeting,” he said.
Mr. Trump appears to suspect that Mr. Xi had something to do with North Korea’s taking a harder line against abandoning its nuclear weapons in recent days.
In his letter to Mr. Kim canceling the summit meeting, Mr. Trump cited “tremendous anger and open hostility displayed in your most recent statement.” On Thursday, one top North Korean official warned that the United States must choose between encountering North Korea in a meeting room or in a “nuclear-to-nuclear showdown.”
This week Mr. Trump noted that North Korea had changed its tone toward the United States after a surprise meeting between Mr. Kim and Mr. Xi in the Chinese port city of Dalian two weeks ago. And he suggested that the Chinese president had egged on the younger and less experienced Mr. Kim in taking a harder line, possibly to strengthen China’s hand in trade talks with the United States.
“There was a different attitude by the North Korean folks after that meeting,” Mr. Trump said on Tuesday as he met with Mr. Moon to discuss strategy toward the North. “I can’t say that I’m happy about it.”
Mr. Trump also called Mr. Xi a “world-class poker player,” a backhanded compliment for a world leader whom Mr. Trump has called a friend and a partner in enforcing international sanctions on the North over its nuclear weapons program.
But analysts also said they thought Mr. Trump was misreading the situation, and that the tougher stance from North Korea probably stemmed more from internal concerns about its own survival than from interference by Mr. Xi.
The confusion and finger-pointing show how complex the situation is, with numerous actors negotiating in multiple channels with myriad and sometimes overlapping agendas.
While it is not known what the North Korean and Chinese leaders discussed during their meeting in Dalian, Mr. Xi was probably pushing his own agenda, including economic cooperation, while advising Mr. Kim on dealing with Mr. Trump, analysts said.
Chinese analysts say China has much to gain from a peace deal that would prevent a potentially disastrous conflict with the United States on its border, and that in the long run might result in the removal of American troops from South Korea.
Many American analysts agreed, saying the North’s recent harsher tone reflected the Kim regime’s concerns about its own preservation, and its bedrock belief that it needs to keep some form of a nuclear arsenal.
“Blaming the Chinese for the change in tone from North Korea strikes me as trying to find a Chinese scapegoat for a summit failure,” said Douglas H. Paal, a vice president at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
However, some American analysts said China had an interest in at least slowing down any rapprochement between the United States and North Korea.
The United States, by pressuring China on trade at the same time it is relying on Beijing to apply tough sanctions against North Korea, has created an opening for Mr. Xi to force the Americans to make concessions on economic issues.
Since the Dalian meeting, Chinese officials have been telling foreign diplomats that Mr. Xi and Mr. Kim discussed how the young leader should deal with Mr. Trump.
However, just after the Dalian meeting, North Korea seemed to back away from its earlier statement that it would consider complete denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula. During a trip to Pyongyang days later, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo hoped to get additional pledges from the North on scrapping its nuclear program but did not.
Soon after Mr. Pompeo left Pyongyang, North Korea kicked off its tirade against Washington, saying it would call off the expected June 12 summit meeting if the Trump administration insisted on “unilateral nuclear abandonment.”
Significantly, the threat was issued by the North’s chief nuclear negotiator, Kim Kye-kwan, a veteran of the North’s foreign ministry who is well known to Washington.
His statement took specific aim at John R. Bolton, Mr. Trump’s national security adviser, who had said on a Sunday television show that North Korea needed to dispose of its nuclear weapons program quickly, following what he called the model of Libya under Col. Muammar el-Qaddafi.
Chinese analysts say North Korea’s elite see Libya, and Mr. Qaddafi’s inability to defend himself when Western powers backed the popular uprising that toppled him, as a warning not to give up nuclear weapons. They said it was Mr. Bolton’s impolitic comments, and not behind-the-scenes Chinese machinations, that hardened North Korean attitudes.
“Subverting the summit would bring even bigger uncertainties to China,” said Shi Yinhong, professor of international relations at Renmin University in Beijing.
Mr. Shi said China would benefit from easing tensions on the peninsula, with a lifting of sanctions allowing a resumption of trade along its shared border with the North. In fact, he said Mr. Xi probably used the Dalian meeting to entice Mr. Kim with expanded economic ties to help Mr. Kim fulfill his promise to his own people to fix the North’s dilapidated economy.
Mr. Trump himself has often linked North Korea and trade, telling the Chinese that he would give them a better deal on the latter if they cooperated on North Korea, said Bonnie Glaser, a China expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington.
Some analysts said this was apparent in the Trump administration’s handling of ZTE, the Chinese telecommunications equipment company. The United States barred it from buying American-made parts as punishment for its dealings with North Korea and Iran, threatening the company’s survival.
The United States then eased off that punishment after Mr. Trump said on social media that he was working with Mr. Xi to give ZTE “a way to get back into business, fast.”
“There was a belated recognition that the trade agenda was complicating Trump’s ability to achieve progress on his top priority of North Korea,” said Ryan Hass, a fellow at the Brookings Institution who was a member of President Barack Obama’s National Security Council.
He said the Trump administration was gambling that showing flexibility on trade would persuade Beijing to cooperate on North Korea.
“Beijing set the price for doing so as action on ZTE and steps to ease trade tensions,” Mr. Hass said. “The Trump administration accepted the terms.”
“Time will tell if that bet pays off,” he said.
Choe Sang-Hun contributed reporting from Seoul, South Korea, and Motoko Rich from Tokyo.
Read more here: NYT > Worldhappy wheels
Dec 15, 2018 0Q-Tip may be known as a pioneer in hip-hop music and an acclaimed producer, but he recently revealed that he’s taken on one of the most heartbreaking roles of a lifetime. The beloved lyricist recently announced that he now serves as his mother’s caregiver after she was diagnosed...
Dec 16, 2018 020 hours ago One must be fearless to play Queen frontman Freddie Mercury — a lesson Bohemian Rhapsody actor Rami Malek learned quickly after he was cast in the role. Malek’s incredible transformation into the rock icon included plenty of preparation on his part. This included wearing...
Dec 16, 2018 0
Dec 14, 2018 0I Tried a Lash Lift—and It Gave Me The Lashes of My...
Dec 14, 2018 0Skin Scare: Could Your Moisturizer Carry a Cancer Risk?...
Dec 16, 2018 0KINGAKATI, Democratic Republic of Congo — His favorite...
Dec 16, 2018 0NEW DELHI — Sri Lanka’s political crisis appeared to...
Dec 16, 2018 0SYDNEY, Australia — Australia announced on Saturday that...
Dec 16, 2018 0ASUNCIÓN, Paraguay — Even Paraguay’s antidrug chief...
Dec 15, 2018 0MEXICO CITY — His mother was grievously ill, nearing...
Dec 15, 2018 0PARIS — Boarded-up shops. Empty cafes. Closed museums....
Dec 15, 2018 0MOSCOW — Ukrainian officials have been raising alarms...
Dec 15, 2018 0HONG KONG — The growing tensions over trade between the...
Dec 15, 2018 0BEIJING — China intensified its punitive campaign against...